Is it more appropriate to DEFER the Public Hearing scheduled for City Council Meeting August 4th 2020 to allow the City to hold the necessary public forum and reach an acceptable compromise rather than try to work a solution during a Public Hearing that also includes very real health risks for its participants considering:
The unknown recent changes Large opposition to publicly seen proposed development 3 Councilpersons needing to recuse themselves Inconsistencies throughout the entire process to date The complexity of the precedent setting “iconic building” WCCB will have in the Shore Drive Community for decades
Recent FOIA documents available below.
Note: Attachments mentioned in many emails were not included for the public to view.
Affects of the Westminster-Canterbury Expansion
Re Westminster Canterbury potential expansion
RE Westminster Canterbury Expansion concern
RE Shore Drive Community Coalition Position Statement – Westminster Canterbury Expansion
Westminster Canterbury Expansion concern
Shore Drive Communtiy Coaltion Position Statement – Westminster Canterbury Expansion
“We have 2 presentations coming up now because of the complexity . . .” ~ Mayor Dyer July 28th 2020
It seems everyone understands how complex the proposed development is. What’s the rush to attempt to push it through with incomplete information & lack of public input on an unseen “new submittal”.
This building should not be built on the bay!
The bay is a community of family and children. This building would be a eye sore on the beach. Plus it would block the view of many condos on the bay, bringing values of their homes down. It is bad enough Shore Drive has a monstrous building that was allowed to be built right next to the bridge! The senior center should have never been built!
Shore drive looks terrible and now please don’t let a large apartment building right on the bay!