This Thursday’s meeting of the B&WAC was a showdown. At the well attended B&WAC scheduled public meeting held on 13 OCT, a large showing of residents came to express their concerns and to ask questions. Many spoke to the committee and packed room to state their concerns mainly with the viability of the proposed Maple Street Dredge Spoils transfer site. Of the 20 speakers, 16 spoke directly against the use of Maple Street as a spoils transfer site, three others on different points of opposition, and one lone speaker on the positive points for Old Donation Special Service District.
Many questions submitted by the gathered audience were answered while some questions were dismissed as “off topic”. When the night ended, many of us felt that our positions in opposition to the city’s plan were on the record and understood by the board. I do not think many of us knew how it would progress past the point that we had left that night. We were determined, well researched, and committed to our positions.
This Thursday’s meeting (Oct 20), was going to be a showdown on the street to determine the outcome of our stated positions. I spoke to Chairman Fraim before the meeting of unanswered questions from the previous meeting and he said they would be answered at this meeting. I asked if the citizens of Virginia Beach would have an opportunity to review and comment on the board’s recommendations before they went to City Council and he said yes. I felt some of the tension between us lessen. We were communicating.
When I was young in grade school, I remember that I did not like to fight and get in trouble for doing so, but sometimes it was necessary to stand your ground and do what you believed to be necessary. This felt like one of those days in grade school. We had gone nose to nose, reached our point, but now we at least started to understand where we stood. We had reached middle ground. It is not a win-lose position, but more of an understanding. We would be listened to and our positions considered. I would like to think that that is the way reasonable people negotiate very important matters. I still do not know how this Neighborhood Dredge Spoils program will turn out, but we are talking and considerate of both parties. Friday started with a renewed spirit and more hope for Long Creek residents. It was a better day, fresh and clear, with a bit more hope for our neighborhoods. Have a nice weekend neighbors and B&WAC committee members. I hope to be fishing with my wife in the middle channel of Long Creek at my favorite trout spot. We are more hopeful than before and remain still confident in our positions.
Tag Archives: Dredge Spoils Project
“Each neighborhood dredging project requires City Council approval, and the Beach needs to find multiple sites to unload the dredge spoils from the barges.”
Read entire article at Pilotonline.com.
This is about:
[A] city proposal to put a permanent dredge transfer station on Maple Street next to the Marina Shores marina.
And:
The commission, which will present its final report in the coming months, suggested that the city use the site for only 90 working days a year, avoid bringing in barges during the summer, and haul 30 truckloads a day of dredge spoils out of the site.
“There are methods of mitigation and opportunities for controls that will eliminate or significantly reduce, many of the issues of concern,” the draft report states.
The city launched its neighborhood dredging program last year to help residents deepen their channels if they agree to a tax rate increase.
Guidelines for tonight’s public meeting re:Dredge Transfer Stations
From an email:
We have received a number of calls about this evening’s public meeting and the guidelines for those who wish to speak.
1) Anyone wishing to speak must sign up before the meeting starts
2) Each speaker will be limited to 3 minutes.
3) If a group is in attendance and has chosen someone to speak for them, that speaker will be allowed up to 10 minutes to speak on behalf of the group.
4) Any questions to the commission from the public can be submitted in advance on cards that will be provided at the meeting. Those who wish to submit a question can get a card from Rebecca Lear and submit the card to the moderator.
5) Because the commission wants to hear from as many speakers as possible, speaking time will be only for direct comments. Any questions will be addressed through the cards that are submitted to the moderator.
6) Public comments will be taken (from those who sign up) until 9:00 when the meeting will adjourn.
The Commission will answer questions and take comments on the four following topics only:
· The feasibility of alternative dredging methods, such as hydraulic rather than mechanical dredging;
· The potential for beneficial re-use of spoils;
· An analysis of the impact on affected communities (both those receiving dredging and those in the vicinity of the existing and proposed transfer stations) with a focus on identifying sites that are sufficient to support the needs of the project but have the least potential for adverse impact for the community; and
· A proposed framework with parameters for operation of the spoils sites, including potential use of the site by the public for dredging by entities or individuals other than the City.
If you wish to sign up in advance to speak, you may contact Rebecca Lear at 385-1948, or e-mail her at: rlear@vbgov.com
The meeting will be held 7:00 pm to 9:00 pm at Great Neck Recreation Center, 2521 Shorehaven Drive.
Thank you.
Drew Lankford
Media and Communications
Department of Public Works
City of Virginia Beach
dlankfor@vbgov.com
(O) 757.385.8062
(C) 757.409.4353
Note: Received this email at 1129a Oct 13 2011.
Beaches and Waterways Commission to Hold Public Meeting
The Beaches and Waterways Advisory Commission will hold a public meeting Thursday, October 13 from 7 p.m. to 9 p.m. at the Great Neck Recreation Center, 2521 Shorehaven Drive, Virginia Beach, Virginia.
The Commission will answer questions and take comments on the four following topics only:
The feasibility of alternative dredging methods, such as hydraulic rather than mechanical dredging;
The potential for beneficial re-use of spoils;
An analysis of the impact on affected communities (both those receiving dredging and those in the vicinity of the existing and proposed transfer stations) with a focus on identifying sites that are sufficient to support the needs of the project but have the least potential for adverse impact for the community; and
A proposed framework with parameters for operation of the spoils sites, including potential use of the site by the public for dredging by entities or individuals other than the City.
Public comments will be limited to three minutes per speaker, ten minutes if you are representing a group.
Citizens wishing to comment may sign up at the meeting or by contacting Rebecca Lear @ (757) 385-1948, or rlear@vbgov.com.
Eloquent Letter to the Editor
If you have a chance, please read the eloquent letter of Mr. Edward E. Cunningham in Sunday’s Virginian Pilot (6/12) entitled “Cloudy Reasoning for Dredge Plan.” Mr. Cunningham has stated the case precisely. If I may quote:
1. Proposed site is zoned residential.
2. Adjoins a preservation district.
3. City’s intended industrial use not simply “a barge and an excavator.”
4. Up to 90 round trips by heavy duty dump trucks daily from site.
5. Neighborhoods may be balking at accepting a long term added real estate tax for the Special Service District.
5. City is balking at submitting Operation Plan to Virginia Marine Resources Commission for the project.
It is time for the City to acknowledge that project is critically flawed. The city’s dog just won’t hunt, no matter what his papers say.